Comments on: Business or Tech http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/ Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks & other techie randomness Wed, 28 May 2014 09:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Mike On Ads » Blog Archive » A Nice Online-Ad 101 Post http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-38712 Mike On Ads » Blog Archive » A Nice Online-Ad 101 Post Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:05:59 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/#comment-38712 [...] I will point out that Ian is clearly on the tech side of the fence though — he draws the industry as a flow of impressions from publishers to advertisers, whereas most media focused folks will think of the reverse — money flowing from the advertiser to the publisher. If you have no clue what I”m talking about, check out my old post: Business or Tech. [...] [...] I will point out that Ian is clearly on the tech side of the fence though — he draws the industry as a flow of impressions from publishers to advertisers, whereas most media focused folks will think of the reverse — money flowing from the advertiser to the publisher. If you have no clue what I”m talking about, check out my old post: Business or Tech. [...]

]]> By: Justin Hitt http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-5232 Justin Hitt Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:17:01 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/#comment-5232 Yes, I guess it would really matter who you were talking with. I'm very technical but picked #2 because I read ... Cingular advertised with ValueClick who syndicates through Ad.com and was displayed on NYTimes. But if I was explaining the technical aspect (i.e. latency or page integration), then I'd say ... NYTimes displays advertising from Ad.com which in this case displayed an ad from Cingular through a ValueClick account. Supporting the on-line advertising process, we need to be aware of both, whether technical or in the site administration. Just discovered your blog today, great work. Best, Justin Yes, I guess it would really matter who you were talking with. I’m very technical but picked #2 because I read … Cingular advertised with ValueClick who syndicates through Ad.com and was displayed on NYTimes.

But if I was explaining the technical aspect (i.e. latency or page integration), then I’d say … NYTimes displays advertising from Ad.com which in this case displayed an ad from Cingular through a ValueClick account.

Supporting the on-line advertising process, we need to be aware of both, whether technical or in the site administration. Just discovered your blog today, great work.

Best,

Justin

]]> By: Dave B http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-4194 Dave B Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:40:42 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/#comment-4194 Very cool Mike. I chose #1 :) Very cool Mike. I chose #1 :)

]]> By: John DeMayo http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-3777 John DeMayo Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:19:57 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/08/04/business-or-tech/#comment-3777 I'd start with the user initiating a request to NYT and then proceed with #1. I’d start with the user initiating a request to NYT and then proceed with #1.

]]>