Comments on: Yahoo v Google — Are times-a-changing? http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/ Ramblings about online advertising, ad networks & other techie randomness Wed, 28 May 2014 09:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: kino http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-147978 kino Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:30:00 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/#comment-147978 I choose Google for searching and Yahoo for news <a href="https://plus.google.com/103353926936001956935/about?gl=us&hl=en" rel="nofollow">Bail Bondsmen</a> I choose Google for searching and Yahoo for news

Bail
Bondsmen

]]> By: donnalyn http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-147973 donnalyn Tue, 04 Jun 2013 04:16:00 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/#comment-147973 Google still leading on SE, they are developing application/s and gadgets, one of this is android. <a href="http://www.easternawning.com" rel="nofollow">Retractable Awning</a> Google still leading on SE, they are developing application/s and gadgets, one of this is android.

Retractable Awning

]]> By: Ed K http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-3172 Ed K Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:51:51 +0000 http://www.mikeonads.com/2007/07/18/yahoo-v-google-are-times-a-changing/#comment-3172 Mike, Have you read 'The Four Pillars of Investing' by William Bernstein? One of its main tenets supports this article, where he states that (basically) good companies make bad stocks, and bad companies make good stocks. With 'bad' companies, investors are assuming greater risk but with much bigger rewards coming (assuming the company doesn't go out of business [ie, eliminating survivorship bias]). Bertstein says that on average investing in 'bad' stocks yields better returns, but that most investors aren't nervy enough to actually do this (everyone wants to hop on the trendy/good stocks). /Ed Mike, Have you read ‘The Four Pillars of Investing’ by William Bernstein? One of its main tenets supports this article, where he states that (basically) good companies make bad stocks, and bad companies make good stocks. With ‘bad’ companies, investors are assuming greater risk but with much bigger rewards coming (assuming the company doesn’t go out of business [ie, eliminating survivorship bias]). Bertstein says that on average investing in ‘bad’ stocks yields better returns, but that most investors aren’t nervy enough to actually do this (everyone wants to hop on the trendy/good stocks).

/Ed

]]>